Folio Bid
Back to productProduct · Clause library

Your last ten years of submissions, structured as queryable prior art.

A tender response is assembled from prior art: past technical volumes, won and lost clause answers, past-performance citations, pricing exhibits and boilerplate. The clause library turns scattered artefacts into a structured corpus the engine can quote, recompose and attribute, with provenance and freshness on every entry.

SAMPLEFolio BidCAPTURE MEMO · CANADABUYS · FEDERALSIGNED OFFPREPARED FOR[ Confidential · Institutional investor ]DELIVEREDT − 3 daysCanadaBuys federalPSPC · Compliance matrix signedRECOMMENDATIONProceed with conditions · Amber riskGRID RED FLAGSSCR at POCWithin methodology thresholdSystem strengthShortfall flagged · remediableMLF trajectoryMonitor, downward trendDMAT exposureClear of mandatory subsetREVENUE DISTRIBUTION · P10 / P50 / P90Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7CONFIDENTIAL · NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION · SAMPLEPAGE 01
Features

What clause library does.

  • Ingest past submissions automatically

    Point the library at a folder of past proposals and RFx responses. Parse each document, extract clause-level answers, tag by volume, agency, solicitation type and outcome.

  • Provenance on every entry

    Every clause answer carries a trail: which proposal, which author, which solicitation, won or lost, at what price. No orphan snippets, no unsourced claims.

  • Freshness and regulatory currency

    Every entry carries a freshness score against current CanadaBuys standard clauses, the Trade Agreement implementation guide and PSPC contract templates. You reuse what still fits.

  • Searchable by Section L, M and C equivalents

    Canadian RFPs do not use US Section L/M/C headings but the structure is equivalent. The library maps mandatory criteria, point-rated criteria and statement of work clauses into searchable indices.

What you receive

A structured clause library, tagged and provenanced, that feeds the compliance matrix and volume generator on every subsequent pursuit.

Why it matters

Canadian mid-market firms lose bids because their library is a shared drive. The winning firms treat submissions as structured prior art that compounds across pursuits.

Shape of the output

What a finished deliverable looks like, structurally.

Examples shown below are schematic only. The structure is real; project attributes are abstract. Every client engagement is confidential.

Static screen

Severity dots across mandatory, point-rated, PSAB and Canadian Content criteria, each with methodology-note linkage and a categorical verdict.

Revenue distribution

P10 / P50 / P90 band across the asset’s operating life, with scenario tags and sensitivity table. Unitless example; live output is dollarised.

Counterparty read

Categorical risk map across offtaker, OEM, EPC and tolling parties, with one-line rationale per cell and a rolled-up IC recommendation.

Next pillar

Compliance matrix

Every mandatory criterion, every point-rated criterion, Y / N / partial with page references.

Read compliance matrix